Færslur sunnudaginn 20. júlí 2003

At 21:18: Warnock's Dilemma 

The concept of "Warnock's Dilemma" is rooted in a post sent by Bryan Warnock to the Bootstrap mailing-list at Perl.org:

The problem with no response [to a post] is that there are five possible interpretations:

1. The post is correct, well-written information that needs no follow-up commentary. There's nothing more to say except "Yeah, what he said."
2. The post is complete and utter nonsense, and no one wants to waste the energy or bandwidth to even point this out.
3. No one read the post, for whatever reason.
4. No one understood the post, but won't ask for clarification, for whatever reason.
5. No one cares about the post, for whatever reason.

Dee of Classy.dk paraphrases it thusly:

"Warnock's Dilemma: The act of choosing whether the lack of response to a discussion-list post is because of its brilliance (there's nothing to add) or because of its stupidity (it doesn't deserve comment)."

As a blogger I face this silent dilemma all the time... At least now I know it has a name.

Reader comments (5) | Permalink