US patent office (sort of) admits it's not infallible

Written May 29. 1999, at 02:00 GMT.

The US Patents and Trademark Office has asked for public comments in search for prior acts when they're determining weather an art is "non-obious".

It's good to see them both admit that they may have made mistakes in the past (they don't really say that but that's what I read between the lines) and use the many-eyeballs effect in their service. I believe this request was influenced by the recent open prior-act investigation of W3C.


More like this: English Entries, .


Ţessum svarhala hefur veriđ lokađ. Kćrar ţakkir til ţeirra sem tóku ţátt í umrćđunni.


 

Flakk um vefsvćđiđ



 

Nýleg svör frá lesendum


 

 

Yfirlit yfir ţetta skjal

(Atriđin í listanum vísa á ákveđna kafla ofar á síđunni.)